Denying the sacredness of human life is to deny God

The value of a human life is non-negotiable, it is absolute because his or her value comes from his or her Creator. To dehumanize the unborn baby is to lessen his or her value, which is an insult to the Lord who made him or her.

Children are a blessing, not a curse.

Ako ay Kristiyano at hindi ako papayag na ang gobyerno ang magtuturo ng sex education!

We should not let the State teach sex education through the RH bill (there is a single curriculum for ALL schools, whether public or private/religious). Sex is always a moral issue, because God defines what constitutes immoral and moral sexual relations. The Bible also teaches us to FLEE from sexual immorality, that our bodies are not our own because we were bought at a price. RH bill sex ed modules are based on Western modules that have absolutely no mention of God, nor of purity/chastity nor of moral teachings in the Bible on sex.
We have no objections to maternal health. Who would object to that? Why not make it purely and simply a maternal health bill focusing on facilities and institutions for pregnant women, without carcinogenic and embryocidal contraceptives, without immoral sex education,without population control provisions and without coercion of health professionals and punishment for dissenters?

The RH bill is more than just maternal health and its authors and lobbyists know that. It is an artificial-contraception-centered, population control, RH indoctrination and coercion bill.

That's why we continue to say NO TO THE RH BILL!

NagdadalanTAO: Ang Tagalog ay pro-life

Alam ng ating mga ninuno na TAO ang batang nasa sinapupunan.

Sila'y mga sanggol, hindi "dugo" lamang.

Komplikasyon ng IUD, dapat sabihin ng doktor

It is unethical to NOT TELL patients of possible complications of IUDs.How will they make REAL INFORMED CHOICES?

Birth control pills are CARCINOGENS, according to WHO IARC

This is our version of the "Filipinay" marketing promo of DKT, manufacturers of contraceptive pills.
Unfortunately, and dangerously, they DENY that oral contraceptive pills are carcinogens. It is dangerous to women to deny that pills are carcinogens! The public has the right to know that they are carcinogens so they can make a REAL INFORMED CHOICE. Would you take a carcinogen if you had a choice not to?

Will you make POISON accessible to the youth through the RH bill?

This is our version of Akbayan Youth's 'Will you make poison accessible to our youth' poster for tobacco sin taxes.


Contraceptive pills are proven CARCINOGENS, according to the WHO International Association for Research on Cancer.

A zygote is NOT a fertilized egg

A zygote is mistakenly called a "fertilized egg". But it is not an egg anymore! It's a human zygote with 46 chromosomes. An egg is haploid, it contains only 23 chromosomes. A sperm is also haploid, it has only 23 chromosomes too.

Pretend I'm A Tree and Save Me- liveaction,org

May people's passion to save trees in Baguio City in the Philippines be the same as their passion to save unborn babies, humans, unique, never-to-be-repeated individuals made in the image of the Almighty God.

Give Abortion the Boot! -youthdefence.ie

NO to attempts to "destigmatize" abortion in the Philippines. May abortion never be acceptable to Filipinos. Yes to love for unborn children. Yes to adoption. No to abortion in the Philippines! 

The Philippines is pro-life!

A Single Living Cell in the Womb vs A Single Living Cell on Another Planet

Babies in the Womb are NOT a "Clump of Cells"-They are BABY HUMANS!

No to dehumanization of unborn babies! 

They are babies, not "blood clots", nor are they "a clump of cells"!

Mga Katotohanang Ayaw ng Mga Promotor ng RH Bill na Malaman ng Taumbayan

The Answer to A Crisis Pregnancy is to Eliminate the Crisis, NOT THE CHILD

No to abortion! Killing a baby will not solve a problem!

Coercion and the RH Bill :The State and RH Indoctrination

You have probably heard the RH supporters’ claims that the RH bill will give “informed choice” to the public, that it is for “women’s health” and for “obstetric care”. However behind this benign rhetoric is the heavy hand of the State in RH indoctrination. Section 16 is all about mandatory sex education for ALL students (both private or public schools, regardless of religious affiliation) – from grade 5 to 4^th year high school.  Section 24 ensures a nationwide  RH “mass indoctrination” by “a heightened nationwide multi-media campaign to raise the level of public awareness of the protection and promotion of reproductive health and rights including family planning and population and development.” Far from offering the public informed choice, it actually sets up an RH indoctrination platform, where no one is allowed to express disagreement nor speak their opinions on the intent of the bill under pain of imprisonment.

You see, the RH bill is coercive. Why is it coercive? It punishes those who object to its provisions. It punishes those who will teach something different from its provisions.

How can it be coercive? Look at Section 28, “Prohibited Acts”

1.       The RH bill punishes local government officials, regardless of their religious beliefs, budgets, and provinces’ health needs, if they do not implement the RH bill in their local government unit.

2.       The RH bill punishes health professionals who withhold information on RH services, and it especially targets those who will do so because of religious convictions. If a pro-life, Catholic nurse or obstetrician chooses to only teach natural family planning to a patient, it is her right to do so and no law should force her to recommend artificial contraception.

3.       The RH bill punishes health professionals who refuse to give RH services. And the religious objectors are required to refer. Why should someone who is objecting be forced to refer , against his own conscience, by a law?

4.       The RH bill punishes anyone who “will engage in malicious disinformation”  about the intents and provisions of the bill. The RH bill dissenters who have different opinions than those who crafted the RH bill are the targets here. Obviously, it will not apply to RH supporters and advocates.

Besides, who determines what it the  “correct” information and what is “incorrect” (to determine what is“disinformation”)? The RH sponsors, lobbyists, advocates and their resource persons. YET, in the present RH bill debates in Congress and the social media, RH bill advocates, lobbyists, supporters are ALREADY denying RECENT(dated May 2011) unbiased evidence-based scientific information (from the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer , no less) that states that “combined oral contraceptives are group 1 CARCINOGENS” and that “there is SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE on the carcinogenicity of combined oral contraceptives”. If these people who wrote the RH bill and are lobbying for it are denying medical facts NOW, how can they be trusted to determine correct information?  Medical science is ever-changing, and new researches reveal causes, effects and correlations that were not known before. In this example, carcinogenicity of combined oral contraceptives is established by new findings. How can a proposed law punish “disinformation”, in the ever-changing  field of medical science?

Moreover, RH advocates are also denying basic scientific facts like the beginning of life. From high school we are taught that a new human life begins at fertilization, at the moment of zygote formation. We have RH advocates who call the unborn as “not human” or “not persons”  and those who arbitrarily, but absurdly, move the beginning of life from the moment of fertilization to implantation. With these absurd unscientific assertions of RH advocates, how can the RH bill determine what is “incorrect” or what is “disinformation” when they themselves deny plain-as-day scientific facts and findings?

          

To be truly fair, RH advocates denying scientific facts and downplaying cancer risks from oral contraceptives must also be punished because these are all medical disinformation. But if it is ONLY these RH consultants/advocates who will determine what is “correct”, then ONLY pro-life advocates will be punished. This is highly discriminatory and truly biased.

The RH bill is like a giant indoctrination and coercion machine. It violates the principles of free speech, and the freedom to practice one’s religion. These are just more reasons to say NO to the RH bill.